|
Quizzes
and tests certainly have a role in education for assessing how well
students have picked up factual information, concepts, and discrete
skills. Because assessment is a feedback mechanism, however, assessments
must reflect what teachers want students to know and be able to do.
If scientific inquiry is important, then a student’s ability
to do scientific inquiry should be assessed in a way that enables them
to show what they have learned. One way is through authentic assessment.
For
the purpose of this guide, the term authentic assessment refers
to assessment by performance, task, product, or project. Authentic
assessment
asks students to apply what they have learned in such a way that
it provides evidence of in-depth understanding, rather than of superficial
or naive understanding (Wiggins
and McTighe, see Resources).
In authentic assessment, teachers ask students to provide evidence
that they have “gotten
it” by actually doing something real. Often, such assessments
include an authentic audience—real stakeholders to whom the
students present information or with whom they otherwise engage.
As students
construct meaning from their inquiries, not all students, no matter
how hard teachers work with them, will arrive at the proper scientific
conceptions. The fact that some students have failed to grasp the
principles of scientific inquiry is often hidden when conventional,
multiple-choice
tests are used. What this means for assessment and evaluation is
that assessment must be process-oriented. In assessing, teachers may
want
to consider questions such as the following:
- What
are the contributions of the students?
- Are the
claims viable in terms of the data collected (including claims made
by students
who enter and pursue blind alleys in their research)?
- How
creative are the research questions?
- Are the
findings consistent with currently held views?
- What
skills did the students use, and how well were they used in the process
of finding
answers to
questions?
The design and content
of an authentic assessment may depend upon how the students’ project has evolved. But in any case, if scientific
inquiry is an important factor in the project, the assessment should
compel students to show clear evidence of understanding the “big
picture” of scientific inquiry (from organizing and supporting
questions, through research and data collection, to hypothesis testing
and action).
Once the “big picture” or central learning of
a unit has been identified, criteria for judging student learning should
be developed. Checklists are a useful way of displaying criteria. Teachers
can assign points to a checklist against a standard, although assigning
points is not necessarily straightforward. Students should have access
to the checklists as they perform. These tools can also make a judgment
about the quality of their work, and this can be used as the basis for
a discussion with them about their progress throughout the project. Teacher
Planning Activities
Continuing
Interdisciplinary Connections:
You should return once again to your
Interdisciplinary Connections
chart (PDF; also available in a Word
file), concentrating on the “Assessment” column.
Developing
Authentic Assessment:
How
can a student’s ability to
do scientific inquiry be assessed? One approach would be to challenge
the students to apply their newly gained skill to a case study or simulation.
Portfolios are another proven authentic assessment tool.
Bringing
in outside experts or engaged community members as an audience for
a presentation
or demonstration can help reinforce for students the real-world importance
of their newly acquired skills.
To explore
the possibilities for authentic assessment, see the following:
For
authentic assessment applications and resources, see the Lesson
Plans as well as
Part 1: To the Teacher of the Project
Action Guide.
Continuing
the KWL Chart:
Return to your KWL chart (PDF; also
available in a Word
file) to complete the “Learned” column.
Next: Summary
and Resources
Top |