VA DOE Torch

     Instructional Media and Training Logo

Web-based Standards of Learning Technology Initiative: Handbook for the Evaluation and Selection of Software for Instruction and Remediation

Contents:
Overview of the Instructional and Remedial Software Component of the Initiative
Purpose of the Handbook
Overview of the Seven Steps to Responsible Software Selection
Recommendations for Staff Development to Promote Effective Use of Software Purchases, including three model software lesson plans - Sharon Hurwitz, Hampton City Schools
Technology Is a Teaching Tool - Linda Holt, Virginia Department of Education (a PowerPoint presentation)
Technology Integration - Linda Holt and Charlie Makela, Virginia Department of Education
Virginia Software Evaluation and SOL Alignment template - for online submission to the Department by school divisions (Word Template)
Virginia Software Evaluation and SOL Alignment database of evaluations/alignments received from school divisions

Links to Resources:
Seven Steps to Responsible Software Selection - P. Kenneth Komoski of The Educational Products Informational Exchange, and reprinted by ERIC/IT
EvaluTech - SREB
Technology - Instructional Media and Training Resources

Overview of the Instructional and Remediation Software
Component of the Initiative

The intent of the Web-based Standards of Learning Technology Initiative is to use Web-enabled systems to improve instruction, remediation, and testing capabilities in accordance with the Standards of Learning. One of the objectives of the initiative is to have “..up-to-date instructional and remedial software applications within high schools.” The purpose of this handbook is to assist school divisions as they implement this objective.

Initiative funding allows school divisions to purchase instructional and remedial materials at a ratio of $1 for software for every $13 spent on hardware. The local matching portion not dedicated to training may be used to purchase software. As a result of funding provided through this initiative, divisions are expected to select and to purchase instructional and remedial software, use and evaluate the software, and provide detailed reviews to the Department of Education for sharing with the Governor’s Best Practice Centers and school divisions. Both the Division of Instruction and the Division of Technology will provide advice and assistance for software selection and use.

In addition to this online handbook, a software evaluation and a Standards of Learning alignment template is being developed. The template will be available for the online submission of the local reviews. The division reviews will become a part of an online searchable database. This database will be the mechanism for sharing information with all school divisions and the Governor’s Best Practice Centers.

For information regarding the Technology Initiative, see:
           The Web-Based SOL Technology Initiative


Instructional and Remedial Software Selection Process
 Purpose of the handbook?

to assist school division selection committees as they implement the software evaluation and SOL alignment component of the Web-based Technology Initiative

 Why use a selection process?
to divide the task into manageable steps
to reach the desired goal - effective instructional materials
 Who should be on the division’s technology-based materials selection committee?
Curriculum specialists
Technology specialists
Library Media specialists
Remedial instruction specialists
Classroom teachers
Building principals
What do you mean by the phrase “technology-based materials or software”?
computer-based instructional and remedial programs, and reference materials
formats include, but are not limited to - CD-ROM, online, laser videodisc, and probeware
What materials do we look for first?
instructional and remedial materials
first year focus of the initiative - high school level
proceeding years of the initiative - middle school, and then elementary school level
Why look at the alignment of the material with the Standards of Learning (SOL)?
to select only materials that effectively address the SOL
to select only materials that will enhance instruction and learning
to provide students with both quality and variety of instructional materials, that address different student learning styles and remediation needs

 

Seven Steps to Responsible Software Selection

P. Kenneth Komoski, of the Educational Products Information Exchange (EPIE), is the author of the Seven Steps to Responsible Software Selection. Eric Plotnick, ERIC Clearing house of Information and Technology, prepared the manuscript for online ERIC/IT access.

In Virginia school divisions, software evaluation and alignment committees will find these seven steps helpful guidelines for selection. By following these steps, the committees will avoid selecting products that do not meet local needs and may not be used. The following is an overview of each step. Please refer to the original document for complete information about each step.

OVERVIEW

“Step 1.   Analyze Needs”
should not be skipped or taken lightly
consult with division assessment specialists to analyze the division’s state and national standardized test scores
identify weak areas
review current instructional and remedial methods and materials
define the relationship between methods and materials currently used and the test results
judge the degree of alignment between the current methods and materials and the SOL
as a committee, be honest in your assessment of where the division is and where you want it to be
continue with Steps 1 and 2

“Step 2.   Specify Requirements”
compatibility with available hardware
user friendliness
level of interaction desired
access to support via toll-free number
direct correlation with instructional objectives and curriculum requirements
adequacy of documentation
continue with Steps 1 and 2

“Step 3.   Identifying Promising Software”
not enough time to thoroughly evaluate all of the software currently on the market and to compare one program with another
use nationally recognized software selection guides as a starting point to identify products that appear to meet your specifications:
 
use guides to help local selection committees to identify a small list of products for local review
guides are NOT recommended purchase lists

“Step 4.   Read Relevant Reviews”
after identifying promising software by using selection guides, read additional reviews in professional journals, ex.:
ISTE’s Learning & Leading with Technology and the archives

“Step 5.   Preview Software”
cannot stress how important this step is
keep records of the committee’s comments and recommendations for each piece of software reviewed
may need records next year, should any of this year’s titles be requested again for purchase
use to justify committee’s selection should these products be challenged

“Step 6.   Make Recommendations”
appropriate classroom applications of each product selected for purchase
need to know why product selected in order to evaluate it's value after a year of use in the classroom
recommendations for related staff development - how will teachers be trained in the classroom use of new software
who will develop and pilot model lesson plans to demonstrate appropriate use of each software program selected for purchase
who will make sure new software is installed first, so that after training teachers can go back to their classrooms and begin using the new software

“Step 7.   Get Post Feedback”
a very important and often skipped step
was each title purchased a good investment - why, or why not?
will each title purchased continue to be used - why, or why not?
was the staff development and training for new materials adequate to insure effective use of products - why, or why not?

Staff Development Recommendations
Sharon Hurwitz, English teacher and technology specialist,
Bethel High School, Hampton,Virginia

Suggestions on how to get teachers to use software in classrooms:

1. Explain why these software programs were selected for purchase - strengths, weaknesses, and alignment with the SOL.
2. Model appropriate curriculum instruction methods, and model appropriate seamless integration of the new computer-based software in the instruction and related activities.
3. As handouts, or an online version, have copies available of the curriculum and technology lesson plans and activities presented to the class. Explain why these are recommended classroom applications of the software and anticipated student outcomes. Identify the specific SOL addressed by the software. Provide a list of additional related instructional and library resources and Web sites.
4. Allow ample time for questions and answers and experience sharing by the teachers.
5. Make your training a fun learning experience for teachers: offer refreshments (sweet treats and fruits), and inexpensive door prizes.
6. Allow ample time for both guided and independent hands-on experiences with the new software.
7. Give teachers a way to contact you or other curriculum and technology specialists for follow-up assistance with the software after they are on their own in their classrooms.
8. Always be cheerful and encouraging; a positive attitude is contagious!

Prior to staff development training on the new software:

1.

Check to make sure that the teachers coming to the session will have the new software (and appropriate hardware requirements) available for use in their classrooms when they leave the training.
2. Plan for a make-up training date for those teachers with schedule conflicts.
3. Schedule the training during school hours; other times will not produce the desired results and positive attitudes among your participants.
4. Develop an appropriate number of peer mentors to provide informal onsite assistance with the new software in the weeks to come after this training session.
   
 
Examples of Lesson Plans that can be used to introduce new software in three selected curriculum areas:

Technology and Learning Software Reviews

Choosing School Software - Tammy Payton

 

Send comments to: Office of Educational Technology



[VDOE Home] [Top of Page][Technology Home]

 

 

Last reviewed and/or modified: March 16, 2006