DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
P.O.
SUPTS. MEMO NO. 66
March 17, 2006
INFORMATIONAL
|
TO: |
Division
Superintendents |
|
FROM: |
Patricia I.
Wright Acting Superintendent
of Public Instruction |
|
SUBJECT: |
Transmittal
of Statement of Administrative Impact and Project Costs of Implementation
for the Proposed Revisions to the
Regulations Establishing Standards for Accrediting Public Schools in |
As part of its responsibility for promulgating new
regulations or revisions to existing regulations, the Board of Education is
required to develop a statement of the administrative impact and projected cost
to school divisions of implementing and complying with such regulations. The board and the Department of Education are
required to send a copy of the statement to each division superintendent [See 22.1-17 of the Code of
Section 22.1-19 of the Code of Virginia requires
that the Board of Education prescribe standards and provide for the accreditation
of public elementary, middle, and secondary schools. Section
22.1-253.13:3 of the Code of Virginia requires the Board of Education to
promulgate Standards of Accreditation for
The
Board of Education shall promulgate regulations establishing standards for
accreditation pursuant to the Administrative Process Act ( 2.2-4000
et seq.), which shall include, but not be limited to, student outcome measures,
requirements and guidelines for instructional programs and for the integration
of educational technology into such instructional programs, administrative and
instructional staffing levels and positions, including staff positions for
supporting educational technology, student services, auxiliary education
programs such as library and media services, course and credit requirements for
graduation from high school, community relations, and the philosophy, goals,
and objectives of public education in Virginia.
The Board of Education is in
the process of revising its Regulations
Establishing Standards for Accrediting Public Schools in Virginia. The
proposed revisions were initially published in the November 28, 2005, edition
of the Virginia Register of Regulations, Volume 22, Issue 6. This analysis addresses
all changes that were part of that proposal and revisions that have been made
since the publication date.
The regulations define the
requirements for accrediting public schools in
The current regulations
contain provisions governing:
Most of the requirements set
forth in the current Regulations
Establishing Standards for Accrediting Public Schools in Virginia (8 VAC
20-130-10 et. seq.) will be retained. The primary purposes of the revisions are
to:
The primary changes are
designed to:
Require
elementary and middle school students to participate in a program of physical
fitness during the regular school year in accordance with Board of Education
guidelines.
Estimated Administrative
Impact: New
administrative features include the following:
Local school boards must:
Provide each full-time middle and secondary classroom teacher with one planning period per day or the
equivalent, unencumbered of any teaching or supervisory duties.
Provide
that each middle and secondary classroom
teachers standard load shall be based on teaching no more than 5/6 of the
instructional day, with no more than 150 student periods per day or 25 class
periods per week.
Public schools must:
Refrain from counting recess as instructional time.
Permit students who were in the ninth-grade class of
2003-2004 and beyond to be eligible to earn locally awarded verified credits
from the local school board.
Projected
Costs of Implementation:
Under the current methodology for calculating the Standards of Quality (SOQ) costs,
the proposed changes would not have an impact on state SOQ funding because the
majority of the SOQ cost for each school division is based on the required number
of teachers using a statutorily prescribed pupil-teacher ratio. Other support
costs are based on a statewide prevailing cost per pupil. These regulations do
not change the pupil-teacher ratio or the administrative and support staff
ratio. Likewise, they do not change the methodology used to determine the
statewide prevailing support costs.
The
proposed revisions do define class
period, planning period, and student periods for purposes of the middle and
secondary classroom teachers standard load and planning period. They further provide that each full-time middle and secondary classroom teacher shall
be provided one planning period per day or the equivalent, unencumbered
of any teaching or supervisory duties.
However, the SOQ funding model currently provides funding for these
items; therefore, the states share of Standards of Quality funding is not
impacted by these regulatory changes.
Any impact on school divisions from these changes are expected to be
insignificant since each division already receives SOQ funding for these items.
Additionally, the proposed
changes do not impact other sources of state funding to school divisions. While most of the requirements are already
being met, there is the potential for an increase in the cost of implementing
the proposed revisions for the following initiatives:
The option to reconstitute a school that is denied
accreditation.
The requirement that elementary guidance counselors
provide a minimum of 60 percent of the time devoted to counseling of students. This provision currently applies to guidance
counselors in middle and secondary schools,
The
requirement that middle and secondary teachers standard load shall be based on
teaching no more than 5/6 of the instructional day, with no more than 150 student
periods per day or 25 class periods per week.
The
requirement that schools rated
Accreditation Withheld/Improving School Near Accreditation must also undergo an
academic review and prepare and implement a school improvement plan.
The requirements for schools denied accreditation in
8 VAC 20-131-315 including:
The
school must notify the parents and other interested parties of the
accreditation rating within 30 calendar days of receiving the notification, and
must provide them with a copy of the proposed corrective action plan and an
opportunity to comment on the corrective action plan. Costs associated with this requirement will
include the production and distribution of the notification.
The school must implement the corrective action plan
approved by the local school board and affirmed through a memorandum of
understanding between the Board of Education and the local school board within
60 days following submission of the corrective action plan to the Board.
The local school board must submit annual status
reports to the Board of Education, and the principal, division superintendent,
and chair of the school board may be required to appear before the Board of
Education to present the status reports.
The requirement that unless otherwise specified,
these regulations are effective for the 2006-2007 school year.
If you have any questions, please contact Michelle
Vucci, director of policy, at (804) 371-0558, or mail to: policy@doe.virginia.gov.
PIW/MKV/cb
Attachment
http://www.doe.virginia.gov/administrators/superintendents_memos/2006/inf066a.pdf