News Releases

Print
Share & Bookmark, Press Enter to show all options, press Tab go to next option

State Superintendent: 2022-2023 Ratings Show Current Accreditation Standards Unreliable Measure of School Performance

Post Date:09/22/2022

For Immediate Release: September 22, 2022
Contact: Charles Pyle (804) 371-2420  

RICHMOND — Superintendent of Public Instruction Jillian Balow announced today that despite deep learning losses caused by the closure of most schools to in-person instruction from March 2020 to August 2021, the percentage of Virginia’s public schools meeting the state Board of Education’s accreditation standards dropped by only three points compared with pre-pandemic performance.

Eighty-nine percent of schools earned full accreditation for 2022-2023, compared with 92% in 2019-2020, the last year for which the Virginia Department of Education calculated school ratings before the coronavirus pandemic.

“These ratings call into question the effectiveness of our accreditation standards in identifying schools where students are struggling to achieve grade-level proficiency,” Balow said. “The number and percentage of schools earning accreditation is almost as high as three years ago, despite significant declines in achievement on Standards of Learning tests in reading, math and science — especially among minority and economically disadvantaged students. Accreditation is one of the primary drivers of state interventions and local efforts to improve outcomes for students, and frankly, the school ratings we are releasing today fail to capture the extent of the crisis facing our schools and students.” 

State School Accreditation Summary

Accreditation Rating

Number of Schools
2022-2023

Number of Schools
2019-2020

Percentage of Schools
2022-2023

Percentage of Schools
2019-2020

Accredited

1,628

1,682

89%

92%

Alternative Accreditation Plan

3

5

<1%

<1%

Accredited With Conditions

190

132

10%

7%

New School

9

6

<1%

<1%

Total

1,830

1,825

100%

100%

Under the accreditation system adopted by the state Board of Education in 2017 and implemented the following year, schools are evaluated on school quality indicators grouped in three categories: academic achievement, achievement gaps, and student engagement and outcomes.  Performance on each indicator is rated at one of the following levels:

  • Level 1: Meets or exceeds state standard or sufficient improvement.
  • Level 2: Near state standard or sufficient improvement.
  • Level 3: Below state standard.

 The following tables summarize how Virginia schools performed on each applicable indicator.

 Academic Achievement Summary

Indicator

Schools at Level 1
2022-2023

Schools at Level 1
2019-2020

Schools at Level 2
2022-2023

Schools at Level 2

2019-2020

Schools at Level 3
2022-2023

Schools at Level 3
2019-2020

English

1,705

1,689

63

81

52

49

Mathematics

1,755

1,769

28

23

38

27

Science

1,381

1,649

153

51

235

60

Achievement Gaps Summary

Indicator

Schools at Level 1
2022-2023

Schools at Level 1
2019-2020

Schools at Level 2
2022-2023

Schools at Level 2
2019-2020

Schools at Level 3
2022-2023

Schools at Level 3
2019-2020

English

1,248

975

477

719

95

125

Mathematics

1,341

1,406

375

352

105

61

Student Engagement and Outcomes Summary

Indicator

Schools at Level 1
2022-2023

Schools at Level 1
2019-2020

Schools at Level 2
2022-2023

Schools at Level 2
2019-2020

Schools at Level 3
2022-2023

Schools at Level 3
2019-2020

Chronic Absenteeism

1,195

1,663

505

133

121

23

Dropout Rate

263

256

46

43

21

31

Graduation/Completion

296

302

29

17

4

9

“The school quality indicator data and the overall school ratings are skewed by several factors that obscure the impact of the pandemic and school closures,” Balow said. “For example, in English, lower expectations on the reading tests introduced in 2020-2021 and how growth is factored into accreditation resulted in more schools achieving at Level 1 in English than before the pandemic. This masks the catastrophic learning losses experienced by our most vulnerable students.”

Prior to the pandemic, the number of students statewide who failed an SOL reading test but showed growth — and therefore counted toward their school’s accreditation rating — ranged from 19,000-20,000. With this latest round of accreditation calculations, the number has more than tripled to 61,000.

Similarly, the number of students who failed a math SOL test before the pandemic but showed growth and counted toward their school’s rating was about 20,000. This year the number has quadrupled to more than 88,000.

SOL Assessment

Students Showing Growth, Not Proficiency 2018-2019

Students Showing Growth, Not Proficiency 2021-2022

Reading

19,000-20,000

61,000

Math

20,000

88,000

“Teachers and principals are working hard, and this is reflected in the growth we are seeing,” Balow said. “And in commending them for their efforts, I encourage educators in every school — regardless of accreditation rating — to look deeply into their data and chart sure paths to recovery and grade-level proficiency for all of their students.”

 The following table illustrates how four schools are rated this year at the same performance level in reading and math under the current accreditation systems despite widely differing percentages of students demonstrating proficiency on state assessments.

School and Indicator

Annual Pass Rate

Accreditation Combined Rate

Accreditation Performance Level

School A: Math

56%

88%

Level 1

School A: Reading

66%

86%

Level 1

School B: Math

40%

82%

Level 1

School B: Reading

58%

82%

Level 1

School C: Math

91%

97%

Level 1

School C: Reading

93%

98%

Level 1

In addition, 136 schools that otherwise would have been accredited with conditions were automatically granted full accreditation due to waivers mandated by the General Assembly. Legislation approved in 2015 grants three-year waivers from annual review to schools previously accredited for three consecutive years. 

Under the Board of Education’s 2017 accreditation standards, schools earn one of the following three accreditation ratings based on performance on school quality indicators, as follows:

  • Accredited – Schools with all school quality indicators at either Level 1 or Level 2. In addition, high-performing schools with waivers from annual accreditation authorized by the General Assembly are rated as Accredited. 
  • Accredited with Conditions – Schools with one or more school quality indicators at Level 3.
  • Accreditation Denied – Schools that fail to adopt or fully implement required corrective actions to address Level 3 school quality indicators. 

School-by-school accreditation ratings and school quality indicator data are available on updated online School Quality Profile reports and on VDOE website.

# # #

 

Return to full list >>