Hearing Officer Decisions 2024-2025
July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025
Case - Reference #25-002
- Whether LEA knew or suspected that the student had a disability. If so, whether RPS violated the student’s protections as set forth in 34 CFR 300.534.
- Whether the student is entitled to home based and/or homebound services due to Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) substantive and/or procedural violations that were allegedly committed by LEA.
- Whether LEA violated child find laws by allegedly failing to timely evaluate the student for special education services.
- Whether LEA violated child find laws by allegedly failing to determine special education eligibility for the student.
- Whether the student should be privately placed to receive a free appropriate public education (FAPE) due to alleged LEA violations of 34 CFR 300.534 and child find laws.
Case - Reference #25-081
- Was the result of the December 4, 2024, MDR in error in its determination that
- Student’s behavior on December 2, 2024, was not a manifestation of his disability; and
- Student’s behavior on December 2, 2024, was not caused by a failure of the LEA to implement his IEP; and
- If so, what are the remedies?
Case - Reference #25-096
- Whether the Student's current placement is appropriate.
- Is the Student's Individualized Education Program ("IEP") appropriate, to include whether the IEP contains adequate supports and training?
- Does the Student's IEP allow him to receive a free, appropriate, public education?
Case - Reference #25-100
- Whether XPS provided the Student her IEP accommodation of adult support throughout the day, as described in her agreed upon Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) at Elementary School for the 2022-2023 school year; and
- Whether XPS denied the Student a free appropriate public education (FAPE) during the 2022-2023 school year by not providing her the IEP accommodation of adult support throughout the day, thereby entitling her to compensatory education under the IDEA.
Case - Reference #25-113
- Whether XXPS failed to provide Student a FAPE during the 2022-2023, 2023-2024, and 2024-2025 School Years by failing to propose and implement an IEP addressing Student's Individual Needs and Circumstances.
- Whether XXPS failed to identify Student's Language and Auditory Processing Challenges.
- Whether XXPS pervasively Failed to Implement Accommodations for Student.
- Whether XXPS failed to provide Student a FAPE during the 2022-2023, 2023-2024, and 2024-2025 School Years as evidenced by his lack of progress in Reading, Writing, Math, and Study Skills.
- Whether XXPS' failure to provide Student a FAPE requires Compensatory Services and Reimbursement.
Case - Reference #25-125
- Whether the Student has been provided with an appropriate transition plan.
- Whether graduation in the school year 2024-2025 on the standard diploma track is an appropriate goal.
- Whether continued private residential placement is required in order to provide Student with a free, appropriate, public education (“FAPE”).
- Whether the Student has been denied FAPE and is entitled to compensatory education services.
Case - Reference #25-126
- Whether the student’s current individualized education program (IEP) appropriately addresses the student’s unique and individualized needs, and/or all of the student’s disabilities.
- Whether the student’s current IEP fails to provide measurable goals.
- Whether XXPS committed the following procedural and/or substantive IDEA violation(s): assessing and/or evaluating the student without parental consent; evaluating the student using unlicensed personnel; failing to provide the student’s records to the parent within 45 days of request; and failing to provide the parent with regular and timely progress reports for the student, resulting in the denial of a free appropriate public education (FAPE).
- Whether XXPS failed to appropriately implement the student’s current IEP, resulting in a failure to provide the student with a FAPE.
-
Whether the student should be privately placed at public expense due to XXPS’ alleged failures and inability to provide the student with a FAPE.
Case - Reference #25-150
- Whether the Student has been denied FAPE?
- Was pretesting required?
- Was a need for multisensory Phoneme-Grapheme mapping services required?
- Did the Student need an occupational therapy goal specific to drawing pictures?
Case - Reference #25-152
- Whether LEA failed to provide the student with a free, appropriate, public education (FAPE) for school years 2023-2024 and 2024-2025 by failing to provide the student with an individualized education program (IEP) that appropriately addressed the student's unique and individualized needs.
- Whether the parent's unilateral placement of the student at XXXX for school years 2023-2024 and 2024-2025 was appropriate. If so, whether the parent should be reimbursed by LEA for tuition, transportation, and related services associated with the placement.
- Whether the student should be placed at XXXX at public expense to receive a FAPE for school year 2025-2026.
Case - Reference #25-154
- Did the LEA commit procedural errors regarding the drafting of the IEP process for the 2024-2025 school year and, if so, did such deny the Child FAPE? If so, what is the remedy?
- Whether the proposed IEP for 2024-2025 provides the Child FAPE in general and specifically:
- Whether the LEA failed to provide FAPE to the Child by not effectuating a behavioral intervention plan "BIP".
- Whether the LEA failed to provide FAPE to the Child by not effectuating a functional behavioral assessment "FBA".
- If the proposed IEP for the 2024-2025 school year does not provide FAPE, what is the remedy?
- Private day or residential school placement?
- Transportation?
- Interim placement?
- Compensatory Services?
- Eligibility for special education services under the category of Other Health Impairment (OHI)?
